https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1738385 --- Comment #6 from Emmanuel Seyman <emmanuel@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #5) > Plack as it is packaged in Fedora requires (at least for building) mod_perl. Yes, there's a Plack::Handler::Apache2 to run PSGI apps using mod_perl2 and it will need to be dropped for any Fedora downstream where mod_perl2 is not available but this shouldn't be that difficult to do. > However, I've never > sent the patches to the Fedora maintainer as he dislikes all my proposals. I had forgotten who the maintainer of perl-Plack is. This is a bigger problem than the dependency on mod_perl2 and means that I'll have to maintain more packages if I want to maintain bugzilla for EPEL 8. :-( > Is starman really usable as a standalone HTTP server? Does it support TLS > and IPv6? Or does one at the end have to run it behind a reverse HTTP proxy? The recommended way to run starman is to run it behind a reverse HTTP proxy and use it to handle only the perl part of your application (static files, IPv[4|6] and TLS would be handled by the reverse proxy). That said, Starman uses Net::Server and should be able to handle both TLS and IPv6. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
