https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376845 Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Blocks| |182235 (FE-Legal) Resolution|NOTABUG |--- Keywords| |Reopened --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I don't agree with your resolution. c/ppport.h is "GPL+ or Artistic". Because Fedora does not permit Artistic, the file is compiled as "GPL+". And if you link GPL+ code into an Artistic 2.0 code (lib/Params/Validate/XS.c), the result is tainted by GPL. Thus the binary package must state GPL+ in the license tag. Raising to the Fedora legal team for a decision. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 [Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/4SMKPTOKPQ3LQKI24ZXC3FKJQTXLRREH/
