[Bug 1376845] The license tag should mention GPL+ or Artistic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376845

Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|---                         |NOTABUG
        Last Closed|                            |2016-09-19 07:43:06



--- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #0)
> Thus I think the spec file should
> mention "GPL+ or Artistic" in the License tag. Now it declares "Artistic
> 2.0" only.

I do not agree. This perl-dist is clearly licensed Aritistic-2.0 as whole.
The fact contains a "GPL or Artistic" licenced file is irrelevant.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]

  Powered by Linux