https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481324 --- Comment #16 from Jan Pazdziora <jpazdziora@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Tomasz Kłoczko from comment #14) > As long 4 years ago it was not the same version of the perl module I've > checked even old package by downloading from > http://vault.centos.org/6.9/os/Source/SPackages/perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.70-1.1. > el6.src.rpm affected package and there is no any traces of gdmb in source > tree. > > In Makefile.PL you can find line: > > $config{LIBS}.=' '.$Config{perllibs}; > > Which adds use $Config{perllibs} not as you suggesting $Config{libs} !!! > Did you had a look on this perl module code before replying that it use(s/d) > $Config{libs} ??? You asked for a reason why in the past the module used -lgdbm. I gave you the reason based on the situation back in RHEL 6, as I remembered it. That was the technical reason. Petr furthermore commented that Fedora has patched XML::LibXSLT, and you can see the patch here: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-LibXSLT/blob/master/f/XML-LibXSLT-1.95-Do-not-link-against-perl-extension-libraries.patch If things have changed since the RHEL 6 days and -lgdbm has been removed from $Config{libs} / $Config{perllibs} in the mean time, I guess it makes sense under the consistency umbrella to remove the Requires form perl-devel as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
