"Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 15:32 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote: > >> o Speaking of the perlmodcompat stuff - is 5.10.0 a good time to get rid >> of it? Or we be kicking ourselves when 5.10.x is released and we need >> to rebuild everything? > > I think we should try to drop it. Upstream perl doesn't really like that > we're carrying it, and it doesn't have a significant benefit these days. > If we get a huge uproar, it shouldn't be too hard to enable it later. Alright, I'll see what changes I need to make to yank it out. >> - shall we just do these as subpackages? Are there any that would be >> more appropriate leaving in the main perl package? I assume we'll >> want to keep the perl-core convention Requiring the new subpackages. > > This seems reasonable to me, but I know that the subpackages are > controversial for some people. Yup - if anyone doesn't like it...speak up. >> o Some of the packages that we split into subpackages for 5.8.8 didn't >> change version in 5.10.0: > >> perl-CPAN-1.76 > > This is baffling. Upstream CPAN is at 1.9205, I thought for sure this > would get updated in 5.10.0. :P Yeah, as Rafael points out, this was my mistake. If there are any that are lower/the same in 5.10.0, I'll bump the epoch unless/until someone figures something better out. >> o How to develop the spec file? Shall we throw one up on the wiki >> somewhere for easier editing? > > I'd planned to start working on it when I got back to the US and put it > on the Fedora wiki for commentss, but don't feel like you need to wait > for me (I'm in the middle of FOSS.in at the moment). I'll do that today. -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
