On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 15:23 +0530, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 15:32 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote: > > - shall we just do these as subpackages? Are there any that would be > > more appropriate leaving in the main perl package? I assume we'll > > want to keep the perl-core convention Requiring the new subpackages. > > This seems reasonable to me, but I know that the subpackages are > controversial for some people. I think, we should use the upgrade to perl-5.10.x as an opportunity to systematically split out all "dual life" perl dists. > > o Some of the packages that we split into subpackages for 5.8.8 didn't > > change version in 5.10.0: > > > perl-CPAN-1.76 > > This is baffling. Upstream CPAN is at 1.9205, I thought for sure this > would get updated in 5.10.0. :P One reason more to split out "dual life" perl dists ;) Ralf -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
