On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 11:58 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 08:09 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > > I'm buying what Ralf is saying here: to attempt to have collective > > ownership via individual ownership and extensive co-maintainers is > > another variant of "dirty hacks". > > > > Of course, I may be totally misunderstanding how the systems work > > together here :) > > The perl-SIG is not a user, And what prevents you from making it one, or creating email alias you could use, instead? > Reference: > > "Note: You may be asked to CC fedora-perl-devel-list on a perl package. > This can be done with the username "perl-sig". This is presently a user, > not a group so it cannot be used as an owner or comaintainer, only for > CC." > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSPrivate > > Any more than that, I do not know, and you should be talking to Toshio > about making possible improvements. Please do not shoot the > messenger. :) Yes, it the appropriate target isn't you. All I can add, provided the limitations of current implementation, I'd suggest you to put everybody having volunteered explicitly into InitialCC list or directly into the Owner field (AFAICT, multiple owners are possible). This would allow scripted update checks (cpancheck) without accidentally interfering with those packages you have acls in effect (e.g. the main perl package) Also it would be appropriate to contact FESCO (ain't you a FESCO member?) to have Toshio implement this missing feature. Ralf -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
