On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 08:09 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > I'm buying what Ralf is saying here: to attempt to have collective > ownership via individual ownership and extensive co-maintainers is > another variant of "dirty hacks". > > Of course, I may be totally misunderstanding how the systems work > together here :) The perl-SIG is not a user, hence it cannot own packages. Reference: "Note: You may be asked to CC fedora-perl-devel-list on a perl package. This can be done with the username "perl-sig". This is presently a user, not a group so it cannot be used as an owner or comaintainer, only for CC." http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSPrivate Any more than that, I do not know, and you should be talking to Toshio about making possible improvements. Please do not shoot the messenger. :) ~spot -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
