On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:22 -0600, Steven Pritchard wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 09:46:32AM -0500, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > I don't have any problem with this. They'll show up in cpancheck as > > packages that I need to fix. You're the one who is getting worked up > > over technical limitations. > > And where would one find this cpancheck that knows how to check the > packagedb? :-) Yet another individual facing this regression? Am using a script to restore a local owners.list from the packagedb and than run a slight modified derivative of a very early version of your script. <snip> #!/bin/sh owners=$(HOME)/src/fedora/local lftp -c get "https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugzilla?tg_format=plain"; \ -o $owners/owners.list.raw cat $owners/owners.list.raw | grep '^Fedora|' > $owners/owners.fedora.list <snip> As my local cpancheck only checks for packages being maintained by me, ... it will not check spots packages. So be it - He receives what he wants. Collective maintainership has failed due to infrastructural defects - period. Ralf -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
