On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 15:41 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:25 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:35 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Maybe the solution could simply be to be able to add some comments in the > > > > pacakgedb, telling who is really allowed to touch the package? > > > > and select 'group members can commit?'. > > > > > > IMO, the easiest approach would be to use "perl-sig" or similar (eg. an > > > "email alias" or a packagedb "alias" (should such thing exist)) as > > > owner ;) > > > > Which, we can't do, without dirty hacks, currently. > > > > You should talk to Toshio about this. > Me? I don't have a problem when the packagedb stuff denotes you to > maintain all these packages all alone, because nobody can distinguish > them from "true Spot" packages nor when these packages doen't receive > cpancheck from because of this. > > This is solely your problem - Sooner or later. I don't have any problem with this. They'll show up in cpancheck as packages that I need to fix. You're the one who is getting worked up over technical limitations. ~spot -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
