On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 16:00 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 09:00 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 04:40 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > Can't we agree upon to collectively maintain these "soon to be > > > orphaned" > > > packages in general? (Q: Who is "we" - perl-sig "seniors"? Everybody > > > who > > > maintains, say, more than 10 perl-modules?) > > > > Sure, this is acceptable to me. I just need to know who the "co > > maintainers" will be, packages cannot be owned by the perl SIG user. > Why not? Not sure. I think it has to do with the fact that the perl-SIG isn't a legal entity, and thus, cannot sign the CLA. As is, its really not an issue, as I don't intend to put acls on anything, its merely a question of who wants to see the bugzillas personally as opposed to through the perl-SIG email. ~spot -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
