Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 10:09 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote: >> On 5/17/07, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > This could at least stabilize things for F7 -- everything is present >> > > the way it was in fc6, >> > Exactly: No progress. >> > >> > Development-wise a step backwards. >> >> At least this way we'd get a chance to take a breath, address concerns >> that a number of people have with this, and plan for F8 in a sensible >> way. > > <Sigh/> Red Hat, you've had all of your chances in your hands, but you > missed them - once again. It's a compromise. It's not perfect, but it makes forward progress without annoying too many people. Like I said, we can work on fixing it better early in the F8 cycle this time, rather than so late in the F7 cycle. And, don't say "Red Hat" - that's pointless, because there's no personal responsibility when you blame an entire company. If you want to point fingers, blame me, because it was my call. -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
