Re: Breaking perl...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/16/07, Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 13:01 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
> On 4/16/07, Robin Norwood <rnorwood@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Ok, that seems to be the consensus.  We'll roll the split into F7, add
> > the needed packages to the buildroots, and get the perl-* spec files
> > fixed for F8.  I'll get an email together to fedora devel list
> > explaining the changes and asking for feedback.  We should also update
> > the perl packaging guidelines wiki page(s).  Spot, I think you own those
> > - do you want to make the change (perl packages should now BR perl-devel
> > + co), or shall I?
>
> Wait -- I thought needing to BR perl-devel explicitly was something we
> were trying to avoid (for portability, among other reasons).  Have we
> moved away from that?

Well, not BR perl-devel, but BR the perl components your package
actually need.

Ok, cool.  I was hoping that was the case :)

                            -Chris
--
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]
  Powered by Linux