On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 15:54 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote: > "Tom 'spot' Callaway" <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:28 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote: > > > >> Looks pretty good to me at first glace - I'm not totally convinced we > >> want to do this right now though...I'd like to get some more discussion > >> on the list first. > >> > >> We'll probably want to re-enable 'make test' at some point, too. ;-) > >> > >> Since this isn't quite done yet, how about: > >> > >> o I build a perl with all the changes except this one, including a > >> 'Requires: perl-devel' for the main perl package. > >> o We let people chime in on your changes over the weekend. > >> o If people like these changes, we'll get them into rawhide next week. > > > > It seems reasonable to me. There are some minor cosmetic changes I'd > > like to make (perl_version as opposed to perl_vers, use perl_version > > everywhere, macroize the other versions so they're easily fixable with > > new perl releases). > > > > I was initially concerned about circular deps (perl-devel will require > > all of these new subpackages), but perl won't need them as > > BuildRequires, so it should be ok. > > Ok - I've got a -15 run through the build system. It seems to work for > me. One other item: We probably should subpackage ExtUtils-Embed too. ~spot
