"Tom 'spot' Callaway" <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:28 -0500, Robin Norwood wrote: > >> Looks pretty good to me at first glace - I'm not totally convinced we >> want to do this right now though...I'd like to get some more discussion >> on the list first. >> >> We'll probably want to re-enable 'make test' at some point, too. ;-) >> >> Since this isn't quite done yet, how about: >> >> o I build a perl with all the changes except this one, including a >> 'Requires: perl-devel' for the main perl package. >> o We let people chime in on your changes over the weekend. >> o If people like these changes, we'll get them into rawhide next week. > > It seems reasonable to me. There are some minor cosmetic changes I'd > like to make (perl_version as opposed to perl_vers, use perl_version > everywhere, macroize the other versions so they're easily fixable with > new perl releases). > > I was initially concerned about circular deps (perl-devel will require > all of these new subpackages), but perl won't need them as > BuildRequires, so it should be ok. Ok - I've got a -15 run through the build system. It seems to work for me. Thanks, -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
