Re: Ownership of %{perl_vendorlib}/auto

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Marius Feraru wrote:
Paul Howarth wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
No, but .. are you sure the perl-Mail*'s auto aren't bugs?
At least I am not.
I'm not sure. Where *should* autosplit-ted bits of noarch packages go?

$ man AutoLoader
...
DESCRIPTION
...
AutoLoader implements an AUTOLOAD subroutine. When an undefined
subroutine in is called in a client module of AutoLoader, AutoLoader's
AUTOLOAD subroutine attempts to locate the subroutine in a file with a
name related to the location of the file from which the client module
was read.
As an example, if POSIX.pm is located in
/usr/local/lib/perl5/POSIX.pm, AutoLoader will look for perl subroutines
POSIX in /usr/local/lib/perl5/auto/POSIX/*.al, where the ".al"
file has the same name as the subroutine, sans package.

So it would appear that perl-MailTools does this correctly:

/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/Internet.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/Util.pm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/_prephdr.al
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/add_signature.al
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/autosplit.ix
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/escape_from.al
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/nntppost.al
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/reply.al
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/send.al
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/sign.al
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/smtpsend.al
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Internet/unescape_from.al
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Util
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Util/autosplit.ix
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Util/mailaddress.al
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Util/maildomain.al
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/auto/Mail/Util/read_mbox.al

Robin, is it OK for me to reopen #73970 and then mark #213561 as a duplicate of that since I don't think I can reassign an Extras bug to a Core component i.e. perl.

Paul.


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]
  Powered by Linux