Re: Ownership of %{perl_vendorlib}/auto

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I've just received a bug report on perl-MailTools requesting that it
> own %{perl_vendorlib}/auto since it places directories and files
> (resulting from autosplit) under there (#213561).
>
> The bug report suggests a few options:
>
> 1. Own %{perl_vendorlib}/auto in my own package.
> 2. Try to get the Core perl package to own it.
> 3. Move the files concerned to somewhere else, such as
> %{perl_vendorarch)/auto.
>
> Option 3 is a non-starter, at least with respect to using
> %{perl_vendorarch), since perl-MailTools is a noarch package.
>
> I could go with option 1 but option 2 looks the most sensible to me.
>
> Any other suggestions?

Well, perl already owns the other 'auto' directories for pretty much the
same reason:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73970

I don't see any reason not to do the same thing here and go with option
#2

Any objections?

If not, Paul, feel free to re-assign the bug to me and the perl package.

Thanks,

-RN

-- 
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.

"The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone."
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]
  Powered by Linux