Chris Grau <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:01:09PM -0400, Chip Turner wrote: >> Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote: >> >> No. Just trying to play safe: this may avoid CGI/mod_perl related >> >> bugzilla entries from ppl that will upgrade the FC3 mod_perl 2 beta >> >> version to the final version. >> >> jpo >> >> >> > >> > The way I understand it, we had mod_perl 1.99 for *years*. Since 2 is >> > incompatible, doesn't it make sense to keep FC3 compatible with 1.99? >> >> 1.99 were all alphas/betas leading up to the 2.0 release. What leads >> you to believe it is incompatible? There shouldn't be anything that >> would break compatibility, except for bug fixes, which likely wouldn't >> break anything. > > The mod_perl 1.999_23 (2.0.0rc5) release introduced a new, incompatible > API. > > http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/rename.html How nice of them! Boy that's gonna cause some headaches. I'd just errata it in fc4 ASAP so that no one uses it before the change hits :) Chip -- Chip Turner cturner@xxxxxxxxxxx
