On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:01:09PM -0400, Chip Turner wrote: > Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote: > >> No. Just trying to play safe: this may avoid CGI/mod_perl related > >> bugzilla entries from ppl that will upgrade the FC3 mod_perl 2 beta > >> version to the final version. > >> jpo > >> > > > > The way I understand it, we had mod_perl 1.99 for *years*. Since 2 is > > incompatible, doesn't it make sense to keep FC3 compatible with 1.99? > > 1.99 were all alphas/betas leading up to the 2.0 release. What leads > you to believe it is incompatible? There shouldn't be anything that > would break compatibility, except for bug fixes, which likely wouldn't > break anything. The mod_perl 1.999_23 (2.0.0rc5) release introduced a new, incompatible API. http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/rename.html -chris
