Does anything actually depend on that existing? Is there any good
reason for shipping it this way in both packages?
Warren
Chip Turner wrote:
We ship perl as /u/b/perl and /u/b/perl5.8.6; it's symmetry!
Chip
Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[perl-suidperl] file /usr/bin/sperl5.8.6 is a setuid binary
Anyone have any idea why we ship this in perl-suidperl along with
/usr/bin/suidperl? Without looking at the package, it seems odd to me
why we ship that binary with a version-specific name.
Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx
--
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
