On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 09:24, Jiri Vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> toatal packages: 610
> passed: 427
> failed: 176
>
> From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now are thus failing from two
> reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch failure. I will put this to FTBF bugs for those 29
> pacakges,
>
>
> In Monday, or as other duties allows I will fill FTBFS bugs for failures with straces and reproduce
> steps.
> In default CC will be, me, Severin, decathrope and java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
>
> Note that during non-sidetag rebuild during fedora 33 branching in start of August, we can expect
> some indirect dependencies to fail.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
A cursory glance shows that some failed with network problems. E.g. plexus-velocity failed with this:
DEBUG util.py:621: Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'build':
DEBUG util.py:621: - Curl error (18): Transferred a partial file for http://kojipkgs-cache01.s390.fedoraproject.org/repos/f33-java11/1710873/s390x/repodata/d901882654dc717c8fc91a6b2f018eeaa538eb6e003b0927bc9ae85895a83786-filelists.xml.gz [transfer closed with 23617146 bytes remaining to read]
(Sigh, flakey s390x machines, we meet again.)
When I retriggered the build it succeeded: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1540681
Might be worth a retry of other failures before filing FTBFS bugs.
_______________________________________________ java-devel mailing list -- java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to java-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
