Hello!
toatal packages: 610
passed: 427
failed: 176
>From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now are thus failing from two
reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch failure. I will put this to FTBF bugs for those 29
pacakges,
In Monday, or as other duties allows I will fill FTBFS bugs for failures with straces and reproduce
steps.
In default CC will be, me, Severin, decathrope and java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
Note that during non-sidetag rebuild during fedora 33 branching in start of August, we can expect
some indirect dependencies to fail.
Thoughts?
J.
--
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx M: +420775390109
_______________________________________________
java-devel mailing list -- java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to java-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
