Agree,
I am not aware of any replacement of this JDBC connector. As you said, it can be easily returned if it would be missed.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:27 AM Jiri Vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 6/15/20 9:13 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Ondrej Dubaj:
>
>> The problem is unknown runtime behaviour of libdb-java (build with
>> jdk-1.8, as it is unable to build with jdk-11) with JVM-11. Are you an
>> active user of libdb java ?
>
> I am not.
>
> Upon second thought, it doesn't seem to make sense to preserve
> libdb-java (although I expect that it's only necessary to fix the
> autoconf check).
Maybe. However upstream of is dead. And usptream confirmed that they are unable to verify that it
works in JDK11.
Imho droppoing such possibly instbale package is probably good way. If it will be missed, then it
can be returned, and the one wishing its return will be used as tester.
Is there some replacemnt for this subpackage? At least theoretical?
>
> Thanks,
> Florian
> _______________________________________________
> java-devel mailing list -- java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to java-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
--
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx M: +420775390109
_______________________________________________ java-devel mailing list -- java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to java-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
