Re: Strange new build failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jiri Vanek" <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Mat Booth" <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Fedora Java Development List" <java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, 16 April, 2015 10:49:48 AM
> Subject: Re:  Strange new build failures
> 
> On 04/16/2015 09:16 AM, Mat Booth wrote:
> > On 16 April 2015 at 07:49, Jiri Vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 04/16/2015 08:43 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> >
> >         On 04/15/2015 08:01 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
> >
> >             Yes. We removed a patch in Rawhide that was diverging from
> >             upstream. Now
> >             Fedora's OpenJDK 8 is more like upstream OpenJDK 8 and
> >             (proprietary)
> >             Oracle Java 8.
> >
> >
> >         This change broke quite many packages.
> >
> >         I will workaround this in XMvn by forcing doclint to be skipped in
> >         executions of javadoc:aggregate MOJOs.
> >
> >         Packages not built with Maven will have to be fixed manually by
> >         either
> >         adding -Xdoclint:none or skipping generating javadocs.
> >
> >
> >     Or fixing the javadocs in packages?
> >
> >
> > Unfortunately, the sheer number of javadoc fixes needed in Fedora and the
> > very few resources we have
> > prohibits this approach.
> 
> 430? Split it among 50 people and you are done :)
> I think in closes surrounding you ill find at least 10.
> >
> > (I for one, certainly don't have time to fix javadoc errors -- thanks
> > Mikolaj for adding workaround
> > in xmvn.)
> 
> I would discourage from it. It is just another divergence from upstreams. But
> well. why not...
> >
> >     The patch have been in rpms for pretty long time. I think it really is
> >     time to fix the packages...
> >
> >     If you can, feel free to send me some reasonable amount of packages and
> >     I will help with fixing
> >
> >
> > This is probably a good place to start:
> > http://koschei.cloud.fedoraproject.org/groups/java?order_by=state%2Cname
> >
> > I warn you it is no small task.
> 
> It need higher then small number of people to fix it.

Another thing to be considered is the verbosity of javadoc patches. They must be upstreamed aggressively as otherwise rebasing will become a nightmare.

Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team

> >
> >
> >     J.
> >
> >     --
> >     java-devel mailing list
> >     java-devel@lists.__fedoraproject.org
> >     <mailto:java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     https://admin.fedoraproject.__org/mailman/listinfo/java-__devel
> >     <https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mat Booth
> > http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
> 
> --
> java-devel mailing list
> java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux