Quoting Simone Caronni (2013-08-05 16:45:12) > On 5 August 2013 16:35, Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This is most likely caused because you are running mvn-rpmbuild install, > > instead > > of using %mvn_build. maven-local pulls in *some* plugins, but definitely > > not all > > of them. > > > > Thanks, I updated the f20 spec file to the new guidelines and this indeed > solved it. I was using the same spec file for f18, f19 and f20. > > Though now I have another dependency problem: > > DEBUG: [INFO] Reactor Summary: > DEBUG: [INFO] > DEBUG: [INFO] guacamole-common .................................. SUCCESS > [2.056s] > DEBUG: [INFO] guacamole-ext ..................................... SUCCESS > [0.255s] > DEBUG: [INFO] guacamole-common-js ............................... SUCCESS > [0.485s] > DEBUG: [INFO] guacamole ......................................... FAILURE > [0.042s] > DEBUG: [INFO] guacamole-client .................................. SKIPPED > DEBUG: [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > DEBUG: [INFO] BUILD FAILURE > DEBUG: [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > DEBUG: [INFO] Total time: 3.654s > DEBUG: [INFO] Finished at: Mon Aug 05 16:40:28 CEST 2013 > DEBUG: [INFO] Final Memory: 27M/344M > DEBUG: [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > DEBUG: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project guacamole: Could not > resolve dependencies for project > net.sourceforge.guacamole:guacamole:war:0.8.2: Cannot access guac-dev ( > http://guac-dev.org/repo) in offline mode and the artifact > net.sourceforge.guacamole:guacamole-common-js:zip:0.7.3 has not been > downloaded from it before. -> [Help 1] > > With the same spec file up to 22nd of July the guacamole-common-js > component that is built as part of the project was used; now the same build > tries to download guacamole-common-js off the web and not using the one > that is built a moment before. > > Anything I should look for? There is already XMvn bug[1] open for this, once I get initial round of FTBFSs cleared I'll try to have a look. Feel free to block your FTBFS on that bug for now [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991454 -- Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Developer Experience PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com -- java-devel mailing list java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
