Re: Build errors finding javax.annotation on rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Orion Poplawski" <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "java-devel" <java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 2:01:50 AM
> Subject:  Build errors finding javax.annotation on rawhide
> 
> Trying to build a new version of eclipse-ptp on rawhide, I'm getting:
> 
> [INFO] Cannot complete the request.  Generating details.
> [INFO] {osgi.ws=gtk, osgi.os=linux, osgi.arch=x86_64,
> org.eclipse.update.install.features=true}
> [ERROR] Cannot resolve project dependencies:
> [ERROR]   Software being installed: org.eclipse.ptp.rcp.sysmon.feature.group
> 7.0.0.qualifier
> [ERROR]   Missing requirement: org.eclipse.ptp.rcp.sysmon.feature.group
> 7.0.0.qualifier requires 'javax.annotation 0.0.0' but it could not be found
> [ERROR]
> [ERROR] Internal error: java.lang.RuntimeException: "No solution found
> because
> the problem is unsatisfiable.": ["Unable to satisfy dependency from
> org.eclipse.ptp.rcp.sysmon.feature.group 7.0.0.qualifier to javax.annotation
> 0.0.0.", "Unable to satisfy dependency from
> org.eclipse.ptp.rcp.sysmon.feature.group 7.0.0.qualifier to
> org.eclipse.cdt.debug.core.source 0.0.0.", "Unable to satisfy dependency from
> org.eclipse.ptp.rcp.sysmon.feature.group 7.0.0.qualifier to
> org.eclipse.ui.views.log 0.0.0.", "Unable to satisfy dependency from
> org.eclipse.ptp.rcp.sysmon.feature.group 7.0.0.qualifier to org.w3c.dom.smil
> 0.0.0.", "No solution found because the problem is unsatisfiable."] -> [Help
> 1]
> 
> 
> Seems like javax.annotation is in
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.17.x86_64/jre/lib/rt.jar, so what's up?

Hi Orion,
javax.annotation has been part of any standard complaint JVM since 1.6. As even 1.6 is EOLed  in Fedora javax.activation has been dropped and packages should start using the in-jvm packages. Simply removing the require-bundle/import-package javax.activation from manifests should fix the problem. If upstream already moved to 1.6 it's worth reporting to them so they drop it too.

Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team

> 
>       678  Stored      678   0% 04-04-2013 11:41 08912a39
> javax/annotation/Generated.class
>       436  Stored      436   0% 04-04-2013 11:41 effb84b2
> javax/annotation/PostConstruct.class
> .....
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Orion Poplawski
> Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
> NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
> 3380 Mitchell Lane                       orion@xxxxxxxx
> Boulder, CO 80301                   http://www.nwra.com
> --
> java-devel mailing list
> java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux