>
> Quoting David Walluck (2013-02-22 21:23:14)
> > In the current guidelines, at least as implemented, most jars are
> > renamed from upstream. There's not even the policy of preferring
> > the
> > upstream name by default. The policy seems to be to rename them
> > from
> > upstream by default (at least with multiple jars).
>
> FYI, in case it wasn't obvious: when you build a package with XMvn it
> will put
> jar files in %_javadir/%{name}/%{artifactId}.jar
>
> I believe this solves both problems for Fedora (always unique non
> conflicting
> paths) and yours (jar file renaming). You can do simple 'find
> /usr/share/java
> -name some-weird-artifact.jar' and get a valid reply. Perhaps even
> multiple :-)
>
> I hope that will make you a bit happier :-)
>
I will only be happy when it goes to %_javadir/%{groupid}/%{artifactId}/<version>/%{artifactId}-%{version}.jar
with a link for backwrd compatibility perhaps :-)
(snip)
> Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Software Engineer - Developer Experience
>
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
