Re: Can we go to Groovy 2.0?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Walluck" <david@xxxxxxxx>
> To: java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2012 7:04:35 PM
> Subject: Re:  Can we go to Groovy 2.0?
> 
> On 07/05/2012 10:23 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > I really hope that the potential packager will package the latest
> > released version in order to prevent such incompatibility problems
> > soon after the package is introduced.
> 
> IMO, gradle is a really bad idea/design. Instead of being declarative
> like ant, it contains actual code to do the build (which seems
> completely unnecessary and will tend to make every build different).

I can not agree more. I have never seen worse build system in Java land. 

Alex


> 
> The code generally extends the gradle API, so if the gradle API
> changes,
> and it does, all build files must be patched. I can say this was
> mostly
> never a problem for ant, which also tried to retain backwards
> compatibility for the most part.
> --
> java-devel mailing list
> java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux