Re: Can we go to Groovy 2.0?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Walluck" <david@xxxxxxxx>
> To: java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2012 5:07:50 PM
> Subject: Re:  Can we go to Groovy 2.0?
> 
> On 07/05/2012 05:45 AM, Carlo de Wolf wrote:
> > We should be able to bootstrap Gradle with any other build tool.
> > Personally I think Ant is better, because of its simplicity.
> > It is just a matter of executing the right steps (which different
> > build
> > tools do with different efficiency.)
> 
> Ideally, I suppose, but someone needs to write it. Worst case, one
> can
> often call 'javac' directly to bootstrap.
> 
> But in the case of something like 'gmaven' where groovy is a
> first-class
> citizen, you'd also have to worry about executing groovy scripts to
> produce the .java code to compile.
> 
> > To me the exit criteria of having a working Gradle is seeing
> > Hibernate 4
> > build. So if you can fire that up, then we have working bits. :-)
> 
> I am not sure if it's true in the community, but for the version of
> hibernate that I worked with a gradle 'rc' version was required as
> 1.0
> final had some API changes. Again, leave it to Java to make major API
> breakages during an 'rc' since those letters apparently mean nothing.

I really hope that the potential packager will package the latest released version in order to prevent such incompatibility problems soon after the package is introduced.

Alex

> --
> java-devel mailing list
> java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux