----- Original Message ----- > From: "Carlo de Wolf" <cdewolf@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 11:49:09 AM > Subject: Re: Fedora vs JPackage naming > > On 02/17/2012 10:10 AM, David Walluck wrote: > > On 02/17/2012 03:43 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > >> So the only solution that at least have chances to satisfy our > >> needs is Ivy :). > > The point is that something as simple as > > %_javadir/<artifactId>-<version>.<extension> probably satisfies 3 > > out of > > 4 requirements, and ivy also supports maven artifact patterns > > (really, > > it is just another location, which could be a simple symlink). > > > > So I would agree with you if supporting these crazy builds systems > > requires a lot (or even a little) extra work. > > > > But it seems to me that we get support for free (or at least as > > best we > > can, by sticking to the simple flat dir and naming structure > > above). > > -- > > java-devel mailing list > > java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel > > I just would like to see maven artifacts 'properly' installed in > /usr/share/maven/repository. > Then we can let upstream maven (and other tools) use that. I would even say that this is the only viable solution for the maven and friends and this doesn't interfere with the other buildsystems so everyone that cares about Maven - Join Carlo and help him achieve that Alex > > Carlo > -- > java-devel mailing list > java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel -- java-devel mailing list java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
