On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: > Andrew Haley wrote: >> Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: >>>> Orcan, please do this. >>> Sure Andrew. Just in rawhide or in stable branches too? > > I think this should be fixed everywhere. > Okay. How about all the other packages that depend on bouncycastle? Do they need rebuilt? >>> Am I doing the right thing? Or are AOT bits still important for java >>> 1.6 packages? (which doesn't make sense to me) >>> >>> Can you explain the dynamics laying behind so we can have more insight? >> >> I'll tell you later. > > The problem with debuginfo isn't that gcj doesn't support Java 1.6, it's that > no debuginfo is being generated at all. I'm really curious about the explanation. :) > I just tried this package with gcj, and the specfile needed a couple of > changes: > - javac -target 1.5 `find . -type f -name "*.java"` > + javac -g -target 1.5 `find . -type f -name "*.java"` Ah, I thought I did this before. I verified that it works. I'll rebuild the bouncycastle* packages with AOT bits. > > By the way, I don't understand this: > > BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1.7 > Requires: java >= 1.7 > > why 1.7 ? > That's a harmless old habit. Back in the day when we had icedtea, it was providing java 1.7. Then when we switched to openjdk, it started providing java 1:1.6 (note the epoch). 1:1.6 is always greater than 1.7 and the above BR and R covers both icedtea and openjdk but leaves gcj out.. But now that I see that the jar files can be produced by just gcj, I will lower 1.7 to 1.5 Orcan -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
