Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: >> Orcan, please do this. > > Sure Andrew. Just in rawhide or in stable branches too? > > I have a question that has been puzzling me for a while: I disabled > the building of AOT bits for bouncycastle because that produced an > empty debuginfo package which I couldn't resolve otherwise (I tried > things you once suggested: no go). I am very surprised: I can't remember you telling me that at the time. I'll have a look and tell you what I find. > So, basically when I make a new java package I first try to build it > with GCJ. If it does build, I build the AOT bits too and I make the > package arch-specific. On the other hand, if the package does not > build with gcj but builds with openjdk only, I make it require java > > 1.5 (this excludes gcj) and I do not build the AOT bits. This time the > package becomes noarch. > > In the case of bouncycastle, I thought that the debuginfo package is > empty because the package really needs java 1.6 and gcj doesn't > support it. I don't understand what would cause that. > Am I doing the right thing? Or are AOT bits still important for java > 1.6 packages? (which doesn't make sense to me) > > Can you explain the dynamics laying behind so we can have more insight? I'll tell you later. Andrew. -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
