Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Packages should generally be buildable on both. If they're not, they >> can be marked, e.g. as dependent on openjdk. > > I've had to do this for a couple of my packages that build fine with > gcj, but whose documentation is not produced in an acceptable manner > by sinjdoc. It doesn't handle javadocs for annotation definitions, > for one thing. Yes, sinjdoc is rather old. If it doesn't do the job, then you'll have to mark your package as dependent on openjdk. Andrew. -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
