On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Packages should generally be buildable on both. If they're not, they > can be marked, e.g. as dependent on openjdk. I've had to do this for a couple of my packages that build fine with gcj, but whose documentation is not produced in an acceptable manner by sinjdoc. It doesn't handle javadocs for annotation definitions, for one thing. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
