Andrew Overholt wrote: > On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 16:06 -0500, David Walluck wrote: >> Andrew Overholt wrote: >>> One concern is that RHEL-5 has an unversioned Obsoletes/Provides on >>> "ecj" which should probably get fixed. >> Fedora eclipse-ecj is also missing an epoch, but only for the ecj >> Provides and Obsoletes. > > Yeah, I saw that :) Thanks. > >> Aside from that, I am all for a standalone ecj. > > Cool. Yes, that'll help a lot. Andrew. -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
