Re: Separate ecj SRPM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 16:06 -0500, David Walluck wrote:
> Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > One concern is that RHEL-5 has an unversioned Obsoletes/Provides on
> > "ecj" which should probably get fixed.
> 
> Fedora eclipse-ecj is also missing an epoch, but only for the ecj 
> Provides and Obsoletes.

Yeah, I saw that :)  Thanks.

> Aside from that, I am all for a standalone ecj.

Cool.

Andrew

--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list

[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux