Andrew John Hughes wrote:
David Herron @ Sun wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Andrew Haley wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 54M 2008-09-08 13:39
./java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/jre/lib/rt.jar
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 24M 2008-10-21 15:40
./java-1.6.0-sun-1.6.0.10/jre/lib/rt.jar
Why so much bigger?
I'd open them up and diff the trees.
Andrew.
Interesting. Assuming they both have similar contents, it could be
that the IcedTea builds enable debug info.
--
Andrew :)
We also appear to be using pack200 for packaging the .jar's and IIRC
that strips out a bunch of stuff.
Assuming that 1.6.0.10 rt.jar above came from a DLJ bundle, I just
looked at the DLJ bundle and it's doing unpack200 ... and there are
files whose name ends with '.pack' inside.
- David
But isn't this the same 'we' i.e. why isn't the OpenJDK build doing this?
--
Andrew :)
--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
Good question, I don't know.
I just grepped through the source tree which will soon be posted as the
openjdk6 tree and don't see any use of pack200. I found the makefiles
that build pack200 but it doesn't appear to be used in an openjdk build.
- David
--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
