Re: Drop GCJ AOT bits for F11?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> [2008-11-20 12:00]:
> I was hoping to be able to keep all arches going with gcj until a
> really first-rate OpenJDK solution was available everywhere.

Do we anticipate this happening before the F11 freeze?  When I asked
this question it wasn't meant as a "let's do it today!" kind of thing
but more a "we need to seriously think about this for F11 now that F10
is basically out the door" :) .

> Sure, the number of users is low, but on lower-performance boxes the
> penalty of not having gcj and gcj-compiled packages available is quite
> severe.

Do we have numbers on this?  I know you are correct but having hard
numbers would be nice.

Andrew

--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list

[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux