* Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> [2008-11-20 11:33]: > Andrew Overholt wrote: > > > Back when we wrote the initial Java packaging guidelines, we said that > > packagers *should* include GCJ AOT bits. Should we remove this > > requirement for Fedora 11 and beyond? > > > > [...] > > This is a bit premature. We still don't have the OpenJDK JIT for PPC and > ARM arches. We're working hard on it but it's not ready yet for prime-time. > Without the JIT, OpenJDK is crushingly slow on these arches. Should Smolt stats on architecture users affect this decision? It says about 0.7% of users are on platforms without OpenJDK JITs. http://smolts.org/static/stats/stats.html Andrew -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
