Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
OK, which packages are these errors affecting? You could add the libreadline-java jar to CLASSPATH after the build-classpath invocation.
Only libreadline-java is affected right now since that's the only package that I found adhering to the policy.
So far, all the packages fail in one of two ways: either the package doesn't work with build-classpath, or it doesn't adhere to the policy.
In any case I don't think you should change libreadline-java to not follow the packaging guidelines, if that's what you were planning.
I would tend to agree, but the tools have not been updated to support this configuration. The choice seems to be to change either the tools or any of the packages to conform to the packaging guidelines.
As it stands now, I am more concerned with breaking existing build-classpath invocations then following the policy since F10 is almost frozen and nothing is consistent.
Left as-is, you will just get four packages with four different policies, and some of these may break existing builds or scripts.
-- Sincerely, David Walluck <david@xxxxxxxx> -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
