I was asked to make sure that tanukiwrapper and libreadline-java were up
to date for F10.
What I found is that there is no consistent policy for either .so
location or .jar location for Java packages in Fedora. Here are some
examples:
Library location:
eclipse: /usr/lib64/eclipse
jss: /usr/lib64
libreadline-java: /usr/lib64/libreadline-java
tanukiwrapper: /usr/lib64
Jar location:
eclipse: /usr/lib64/java
jss: /usr/lib/java
libreadline-java: /usr/lib64/libreadline-java
tanukiwrapper: /usr/share/java
I believe that libreadline-java was meant to be the model for the JNI
policy, but the problem is that jpackage-utils (build-classpath) does
not seem to be updated to work with the new jar location. NB: I tested
on F9, so if this has changed, let me know.
We have very little time to do anything about this before the F10
freeze, so I suggest we take the path of least-resistance, e.g., we have
to move libreadline-java back since we would not be able to update all
the packages and the tools and make sure that they work in time for F10.
--
Sincerely,
David Walluck
<david@xxxxxxxx>
--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
