Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
> 2008/7/2 Mary Ellen Foster <foster@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> 2008/7/2 Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>> But I'm not sure if I want to make these modifications to the package.
>>>> If I build a JNI program against gcj, can the resulting .so be used
>>>> with Sun-like JVMs? How does this work? Is it documented anywhere?
>>> I think so.
>> Hmm. Maybe I'll give that a try this afternoon then.
>
> Well, would you look at that -- JNI shared objects built against GCJ
> do indeed seem to work just fine when I run them with IcedTea or
> OpenJDK. That's cool! So my Java sub-package can now be enabled on F8
> ppc{64} as well, which is a bonus.
Excellent. We aim to please. :-)
Andrew.
--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
