Re: libvirt-java bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/7/1 David Walluck <david@xxxxxxxx>:
> Unfortunately, there are recent packages passing the Fedora review that
> directly specify java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel as the JDK and I personally
> don't like this.

I have one recent package that does this (specifies openjdk on F9+ and
icedtea on F8) and one that doesn't (just wants java >= 1.5). The
first package uses JNI and needs a Sun-like JVM to work (or at least
it took more autotools hacking than I cared to try to make it work),
and if I just put Requires: java it tended to grab gcj. I guess I
could also put java > 1.5, but the issue isn't the 1.5-ness, it's the
Sun-style JNI classes.

(The packages are pl-jpl and ice-java, respectively, if you're wondering).

MEF

-- 
Mary Ellen Foster -- http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/
Informatik 6: Robotics and Embedded Systems, Technische Universität München
and ICCS, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh

--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list

[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux