On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 10:44 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 08:55 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that someone should be able to. I plan to > > create a small test case today and file it. > > BTW. For those playing along at home, Andrew created > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31302 with a small test > case, that has a fixed for it checked into classpath CVS by Casey now. > Needs backporting to gcj and retesting now. Wait, that is actually wrong. The fix that got checked into classpath CVS is for "FYI: fix keyUsage bit checking", the patch mentioned in the bug report isn't in CVS yet (waiting for more testing). Cheers, Mark
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
