Andrew Overholt wrote: > xmlrpc 3.0 looks
different enough from 2.0.1 and we have things that need 2.0.1 (some plexus stuff), so I think having a separate package is acceptable. Can anyone see a problem with this?
FWIW, this makes sense to me. AG -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
