Re: F7 plan (gcj/java/eclipse/swt/java-gnome/fop/batik/etc)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Yes, these priorities are useful. Since we are mostly compiler, runtime,
> library hackers, and don't actually know much about the processes of the
> doc-team, could you describe the "workflow" you would do? If you could
> describe/show some sample input files, the stylesheets you would use,
> the commands you would use to transform them and how you would expect
> the rendered output files to look like that would be very helpful.

Mark:

Sorry I've not been watching this thread as carefully on f-devel-java-l.
When you are ready for some testing from our toolchain, please post to
fedora-docs-list.

thx - Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor    ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list

[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux