Andrew Overholt writes: > * Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> [2007-02-06 11:17]: > > Andrew Overholt writes: > > > * Mark Wielaard <mark@xxxxxxxxx> [2007-02-06 04:15]: > > > > more standards compliant (although I guess that doesn't help if your > > > > application isn't using xml in a compliant way). > > > > > > Yeah, I also find it very hard to track down bugs that are deep within > > > Eclipse or in wacky ant scripts + custom ant tasks. Also, the lack of > > > debugging still sucks (yes, I know it's being worked on). > > > > Hey, I've been using the FC6 spin of gdb on Java code and it's great. > > gdb isn't really a great solution for Eclipse plugins. It's doable, > yes, but a PITA. OK; I've never tried. I'm not sure why an Eclipse plugin would be any different from any other bit of Java code, but I'll take your word for it. > > Optimized code is a pain to debug, but non-optimized code works a > > treat. There are still a few features I'd like to add, of course. > > Are our RPMs non-optimized? I hope not! :-) If I need to debug an installed RPM for long enough that the weirdness of debugging optimized code starts to get on my nerves, I'll recompile the jarfile[s] in question: it's just "gcj -g -shared ... foo.jar -o /lib/foo.jar.so" Andrew. -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
