Re: gnuxml -> xerces/xalan?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> [2007-02-06 11:17]:
> Andrew Overholt writes:
>  > * Mark Wielaard <mark@xxxxxxxxx> [2007-02-06 04:15]:
>  > > more standards compliant (although I guess that doesn't help if your
>  > > application isn't using xml in a compliant way).
>  > 
>  > Yeah, I also find it very hard to track down bugs that are deep within
>  > Eclipse or in wacky ant scripts + custom ant tasks.  Also, the lack of
>  > debugging still sucks (yes, I know it's being worked on).
> 
> Hey, I've been using the FC6 spin of gdb on Java code and it's great.

gdb isn't really a great solution for Eclipse plugins.  It's doable,
yes, but a PITA.

> Optimized code is a pain to debug, but non-optimized code works a
> treat.  There are still a few features I'd like to add, of course.

Are our RPMs non-optimized?

Andrew

Attachment: pgpDNrSwCjgVt.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
fedora-devel-java-list mailing list
fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list

[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux