Hi, On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 14:34 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <mark@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Mark> For that last point it would be really nice to have a svn branch in > Mark> upstream gcc. Since I am sure we could share some work with other > Mark> distributions. Matthias (CCed) already tried to sync the Debian gcc > Mark> packages with the Fedora packages, but we had some trouble getting a > Mark> working patch out of the srpm. Hopefully we can get the Fedora patch set > Mark> into svn somehow so we can get svn merge to help us with the update. > > Jakub had asked for a patch rather than a branch, so that's what we > did. > > But really we can do both -- I wish I'd thought of this when doing the > merge. That is, we can make a branch, do stuff there, and then just > diff it against the RH 4.1 branch whenever we need to provide Jakub > with an updated patch. Note that Jakub added the whole patch to redhat/gcc-4_1-branch svn branch in the upstream gcc repository now. http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&revision=115879 So we can base our work on that by doing some svn merge magic :) Cheers, Mark -- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
