Hi, On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 14:48 -0400, David Walluck wrote: > I don't think it matters that it's being done late in the test cycle. > The new classpath versions are generally so much better than the old > ones, that I think it will be worth it. Thanks! We are always working hard to make sure every release is only better and doesn't have bad regressions. > I will be wanted to test the libgcj rpm whenever it is released. I was > actually able to build HEAD (4.2) with the 4.1.1 compiler with a few > changes, but then the bins don't look in the right place for the .spec > file, etc. I don't know if that kind of setup is supported anyway, but > at least HEAD already has 0.91 checked in. And there is now a patch for 0.92-pre (hopefully close to 0.92 final) for HEAD: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2006-07/msg00057.html Testers welcome! Hopefully we will be able to backport most of that to 4.1 Cheers, Mark
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-java-list mailing list fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
